VIVIAN ALMA BELL
v.
ROBERT DEWEY BELL

Fla. | 1947-03-28
THOMAS, C.J., TERRELL and CHAPMAN, JJ. and MILLARD B. SMITH, Associate Justice, concur.
158 Fla. 662 Florida Supreme Court (1947) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 29 So. 2d 757
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM:

This is a certificate under Rule 38 of the Rules of this Court, but on examination of the record, we think the question presented is not contemplated by that rule. The certificate is accordingly denied on authority of Schwob Clothing Company of Florida v. Florida Industrial Commission, 152 Fla. 203, 11 So. 2d. 782.

THOMAS, C.J., TERRELL and CHAPMAN, JJ. and MILLARD B. SMITH, Associate Justice, concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • McKinley Freeman v. Blackburn, 92 So. 2d 262 (Fla. 1957)
    …did actually give permission to petitioner to appeal and that through omission or inadvertence the said order was not recorded, nor does it show that permission was given to take the appeal as the statute requires. State ex rel. Brister v. Brister, 158 Fla. 662, 29 So. 2d 699; Wright v. State, 32 Fla. 472, 14 So. 43; State ex rel. Wilson v. Quigg, 154 Fla. 348, 17 So. 2d 697. The purpose of a nunc pro tunc order is to supply an omission in the record of action previously done which omission was made throug…
  • Griffith v. State of Fla. on the relation of William D. Crownover, 152 So. 2d 818 (Fla. 2d DCA 1963)
    …it is required under section 79.11, F.S.A., relating to appeals from habeas corpus orders, that the judge shall grant permission for the appeal. Cited by the State in support of this procedure are the cases of State ex rel. Brister v. Brister, 1947, 158 Fla. 662, 29 So. 2d 699; Freeman v. Blackburn, Fla., 1957, 92 So. 2d 262; Shenk v. Shenk, Fla. App., 1961, 126 So. 2d 286, cert. denied Fla., 138 So. 2d 340. The State then urges that since the judge did not grant the permission in the order appealed from, i…
  • McDonald v. Frates, 133 So. 2d 775 (Fla. 3d DCA 1961)
    …ticle V of the Constitution, supra, granting the privilege of an appeal as a matter of right, and is an impairment of a vested right granted by the Constitution. The statute must yield to the Constitution. In State ex rel. Brister v. Brister, 1947, 158 Fla. 662, 29 So. 2d 699, the Supreme Court held that leave to appeal was jurisdictional and dismissed the appeal for want of jurisdiction because no leave to appeal had been granted. If leave to appeal is jurisdictional under the amended Article V of the Con…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw