PALM BEACH MALL, INC., PETITIONER,
v.
INTERSTATE HAWAIIAN, INC., RESPONDENT

Fla. 4th DCA | 1979-03-14
No. 77-2616
DAUKSCH and LETTS, JJ., and STET-TIN, HERBERT, Associate Judge, concur.
375 So. 2d 2 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1979) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

CERTIORARI DENIED.

DAUKSCH and LETTS, JJ., and STET-TIN, HERBERT, Associate Judge, concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Sinkfield v. State, 592 So. 2d 322 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)
    …. The motion was timely filed pursuant to our order granting appellant’s motion to withdraw the mandate and republish the opinion because appellant did not timely receive a copy of our per curiam affirmance filed July 16, 1991. See Gardner v. State, 375 So. 2d 2 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979); Brown v. State, 502 So. 2d 979, 980 n. 1 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987).…
  • Brown v. State, 502 So. 2d 979 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987)
    …motion was timely filed pursuant to our order granting appellant's motion to withdraw the mandate and republish the opinion because appellant did not timely receive a copy of our opinion filed October 31, 1986, 496 So. 2d 961. See Gardner v. State, 375 So. 2d 2 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979). . We commend appellant’s counsel for filing a motion for rehearing which fully comports with the requirements and purpose of rule 9.330, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. Concisely presenting important points without reargu…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw