EDDIE L. WILLIAMS A/K/A FREDDIE WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
Appellant attacks the orders revoking his probation in three cases. The revocations were based on a substantial ground for which there is adequate support in the record. However, the orders also specify appellant’s failure to live and remain at liberty without violating any law as an additional ground for revocation. This was improper because there was no evidence presented from which the court could find that appellant had violated any law. Coxon v. State, 365 So. 2d 1067 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).
Accordingly, we strike the latter ground from the three orders of revocation. In all other respects, the orders of revocation, together with the judgments and sentences, are affirmed.
GRIMES, C. J., OTT, J., and STRICKLAND, J. TIM, Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Delgado v. State, 423 So. 2d 603 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)…the consent of his probation supervisor, and (b) possessed a concealed firearm, are stricken as being unsupported by the evidence. Upon remand in this cause, the trial court shall strike such findings from the order under review. Williams v. State, 375 So. 2d 867 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979); Brouillett v. State, 373 So. 2d 449 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). The sentences imposed in this case are affirmed with one modification. It appears that the appellant may not have been given full credit for the jail time he served on the…
-
Duncan v. State, 618 So. 2d 281 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993)…upon revocation. We affirm the order revoking probation, but strike that portion which finds Mr. Duncan attempted to hit the officers with a “police judo handcuff stick set” because such finding is not supported by the evidence. Williams v. State, 375 So. 2d 867 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). We affirm the sentences, imposed pursuant section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1991), in case number 91-3770. See King v. State, 597 So. 2d 309 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). We reverse the ten-year sentences imposed in case numbers 89-11…
-
Scott v. State, 621 So. 2d 716 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993)…mitted spousal battery on February 12, 1991; and (3).he obstructed an officer on February 12, 1991. However, we strike the additional violations described in the revocation order because they were not supported by the evidence. See Williams v. State 375 So. 2d 867 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). We also affirm Mr. Scott’s sentences imposed upon revocation of community control and probation. At the original sentencing hearing, his counsel waived a presentence investigation and stipulated to the accuracy of the scoreshee…
Authorities Cited
- Coxon v. State, 365 So. 2d 1067 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979)