GEORGE CHIAPPA, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (18 total)

• Duncan v. Duncan, 379 So. 2d 949 (Fla. 1980)
  …erty held as tenants by the entirety will not arise when the property is acquired from funds generated by a working spouse while the other spouse performed normal household and child-rearing responsibilities. Ball v. Ball; accord Fiedler v. Fiedler, 375 So. 2d 1119 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). The vested property interest established by this type of “special equity” is not alimony. It is clearly distinguishable from the “special equity” finding used to justify lump sum alimony. This distinction is set forth in our opi…
• Roffe v. Moises Roffe, 404 So. 2d 1095 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
  …(Fla.1980). . Each of the cases which has followed Ball on the “connected source” point likewise concerns entireties property. E. g., Smith v. Smith, 378 So. 2d 11, 18 (Fla.3d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 388 So. 2d 1118 (Fla.1980); Fiedler v. Fiedler, 375 So. 2d 1119, 1120 (Fla.2d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 383 So. 2d 1193 (Fla.1980). . The author of this opinion dissents from this conclusion. On the authority of Foss v. Foss, 392 So. 2d 606 (Fla.3d DCA 1981); Colucci v. Colucci, supra, and many similar decisions…
• Earlene P. Bullard v. Bullard, 380 So. 2d 1090 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)
  …d that the trial judge abused his discretion in determining that none existed as to these items. Ingram v. Ingram, 379 So. 2d 955 (Fla.1980); Ball v. Ball, 335 So. 2d 5 (Fla.1976); Smith v. Smith, 378 So. 2d 11 (Fla.3d DCA 1979); Fiedler v. Fiedler, 375 So. 2d 1119 (Fla.2d DCA 1979); see Duncan v. Duncan, 379 So. 2d 949 (Fla.1980); Canakaris v. Canakaris (Fla.1980) (Case no. 54,124, opinion filed, January 31, 1980).3 Because of the particular circumstances under which it was acquired, we reach a contrary conc…

Authorities Cited

• Williams v. State, 316 So. 2d 267 (Fla. 1975)