CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE,
v.
ROBERT RISCOE, APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANT

Fla. 4th DCA | 1979-10-19
No. 79-1357
DOWNEY, C. J., and ANSTEAD and LETTS, JJ., concur.
376 So. 2d 30 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1979) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

By a special election a city council member was elected to fill a vacancy created by the resignation of a prior council member. The trial court ruled that the term of office of the newly elected council member extends only to the next general election rather than to the end of the term for which the prior council member was elected. Although we agree that the controlling city ordinances are somewhat ambiguous, it is our conclusion that those ordinances provide that the term of office of the newly elected council member extends to the entire unexpired term of the prior council member. Accordingly, this cause is reversed and remanded with directions that a final judgment be entered in accordance herewith.

DOWNEY, C. J., and ANSTEAD and LETTS, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Weiss v. Prudential Enters., Inc., 387 So. 2d 457 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980)
    …of a tax deed is essential to the validity of the deed. See Montgomery v. Gipson, 69 So. 2d 305 (Fla.1954); Stubbs v. Cummings, 336 So. 2d 412 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976); Alper v. LaFrancis, 155 So. 2d 405 (Fla. 2d DCA 1963); Edgewood Boys’ Ranch v. Ernst, 376 So. 2d 30 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Mid-State Homes, Inc. v. Prosser, 196 So. 2d 775 (Fla. 2d DCA 1967). The clerk’s failure to comply strictly with the statutory notice requirements in this case renders the tax deed void. The requirements of § 197.256(1), Fla. S…
  • …search report concerning those persons and their interests. Strict compliance with the applicable statutes is what is necessary to make a good title by tax deed, Jernigan v. Harrison, 136 Fla. 320, 186 So. 511 (1939), Edgewood Boys’ Ranch v. Ernst, 376 So. 2d 30 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), and strict compliance is what was afforded here. On this summary judgment record there is no genuine issue as to any material fact, and on the undisputed facts Kovaleski’s title was good against the world, including Shaw and Ches…
  • Abe Saada and Regina S. Saada v. Dawson, 573 So. 2d 1008 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991)
    …. 2d 457 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980). See also Montgomery v. Gipson, 69 So. 2d 305 (Fla.1954); Ozark Corp. v. Pattishall, 135 Fla. 610, 185 So. 333 (1938); Kovaleski v. Tallahassee Title Co., 391 So. 2d 315 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980); Edgewood Boys Ranch v. Ernst, 376 So. 2d 30 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 386 So. 2d 636 (Fla.1980); Alper v. LaFrancis, 155 So. 2d ,405 (Fla. 2d DCA 1963). It is unlikely that the legislature would seek to immunize the government from complying with the legislature’s own notice requireme…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw