STEVEN VAN HOOSE, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
STEVEN VAN HOOSE, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
376 So. 2d 482
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1979)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed on authority of Smith v. State, 375 So. 2d 864 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Odom v. State, 375 So. 2d 1079 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979) (Case No. MM-296, opinion filed August 28, 1979); Bay v. State, 374 So. 2d 1002 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1979); Thompson v. State, 368 So. 2d 670 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Jones v. State, 358 So. 2d 37 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); McPhee v. State, 254 So. 2d 406 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Am. Bankers Ins. Co. v. Vella Little, 393 So. 2d 1063 (Fla. 1980)…o decide what effect, if any, this discrepancy might have on claimants’ rights to compensation. See Patrick Fruit Co. v. Boykins, IRC Order 2-3904 (Sept. 11, 1979) (discussion of the proper calculation). See also Winn Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Crawford, 376 So. 2d 482 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979); Husky Indus, v. Mixon, IRC Order 2-3905 (Sept. 11, 1979). . “Both Social Security and Workmen’s Compensation are social welfare legislation ... Most of the argument for the Workmen’s Compensation offset came from employers who…
Authorities Cited
- McPHEE v. State, 254 So. 2d 406 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971)
- Jones v. State, 358 So. 2d 37 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978)
- Metro. Dade Cnty. v. Martinez, 375 So. 2d 864 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
- RAY v. State, 374 So. 2d 1002 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979)
- Hollis Yates Odom v. State, 375 So. 2d 1079 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979)
- Thompson v. State, 368 So. 2d 670 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)