SYDSTEAD CORPORATION, KENASTRON CORPORATION, PETFORD CORPORATION, MELFERIN CORPORATION, REXOD CORPORATION, AND DESOTO PARK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., APPELLANTS,
v.
DESOTO PARK CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A condominium recreational lessee challenged an adjusted rent increase that occurred less than ten years from the lease commencement. The trial court granted an injunction based on a 1974 Florida statute prohibiting cost-of-living adjustments at intervals shorter than ten years. The appellate court reversed, holding the statute's effective date language exempted pre-July 1, 1974 contracts from the ten-year requirement.
Section 711.63(6)'s ten-year requirement does not apply to contractual rights acquired under contracts for sale of condominium units executed before July 1, 1974. The statutory amendment's own effective date provisions, specifically Section 19 of Chapter 74-104 Laws of Florida, exempt such pre-July 1, 1974 contracts from the new ten-year limitation.
[1] A statutory amendment prohibiting cost of living increases on condominium recreational leases at intervals of less than ten years does not apply to rights established by…
[2] A statute's effective date provisions may exempt certain pre-existing contractual rights from its application.
Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Rights established by contract for sale of a unit by a developer to a prospective unit owner prior to July 1, 1974”
Excerpt from the statute's effective date provision showing that pre-July 1, 1974 contracts were exempted from the new ten-year adjustment requirement
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceDeSoto Park Condominium began sales in early 1973, with approximately 200-300 unit purchase contracts executed before July 1, 1974. Each contract inco…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Effective Date Of Statutes cases and more on FLexlaw
BERANEK, Judge.
This is an interlocutory appeal from an order entered February 19, 1979, which granted a temporary injunction against collection of adjusted rents under a condominium recreational lease. Appellant was the defendant and lessor under the recreational lease. We reverse.
The injunction arises out of an action by appellee, DeSoto Park Condominium Association, Inc., which occupied the position of the lessee under a 99 year lease for condominium recreational facilities.
The trial court enjoined defendant from collecting or attempting, to collect adjusted rentals based upon a cost of living increase. The trial court found that the adjustment was at an interval less than ten years and that such was in contravention of Section 711.63(6), Florida Statutes (Supp.1974). This statute prohibits cost of living increases on condominium recreational leases at intervals of less than ten years.
The controversy presented here relates to the effective date of this statute and whether it applies to the facts presented in this case.
In early 1973 sales began on the DeSoto Park Condominium. Some 200 to 300 contracts for sale of units were executed prior to July 1, 1974. Each of these contracts contained a clause which incorporated certain condominium documents including the agreement for recreational facilities, declaration of condominium and bylaws. In paragraph 12 of the purchase agreement, the purchasers acknowledged receipt of the condominium documents which included the agreement for recreational facilities. In this agreement it was provided that an initial cost of living adjustment of the rent was to be paid by the condominium association on February 1, 1979, and thereafter adjustments were to be made on intervals of five years.
Clearly, the five-year provision set out in the agreement for recreational facilities would contravene the ten-year requirement in Statute 711.63(6), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1974), if the 1974 statutory amendment is applicable. The effective date provisions contained in Chapter 74-104 Laws of Florida provide for a general effective date as of October 1, 1974. Section 19 of Chapter 74^104 Laws of Florida states more specifically that nothing contained in Section 7Í1.-63 other than subsection (4) shall affect: “(a) Rights established by contract for sale of a unit by a developer to a prospective unit owner prior to July 1, 1974.” We find subsection (a) above to be controlling and hold the ten-year provision inapplicable. Since numerous contracts predated July 1, 1974, and since we construe the effective date provisions to make Section 711.63(6) inapplicable, the trial court erred. Legislation which diminishes the value of a contract right previously acquired and legal at the time of acquisition may well be unconstitutional. Dewberry v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company, 363 So. 2d 1077 (Fla.1978). We need not determine the constitutional issue here though because we conclude the statutory amendment was inapplicable by its own terms and that the ten-year limitation on the rent adjustment did not apply to the contractual rights acquired under the pre-July 1, 1974, contracts.
The trial court also found against appellants on the issue of waiver and estoppel. We do not decide this issue in view of our ruling above. We also do not pass upon the issues raised regarding bond and supersede-as.
The order below granting a temporary injunction is reversed and the matter remanded for further proceedings.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
DAUKSCH, JAMES C., Jr., and SCHWARTZ, ALAN R., Associate Judges, concur.