DONALD A. KELLOGG, APPELLANT,

v.

LLOYD G. FOUND AND MILDRED E. FOUND, APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By (21 total)

• Atkins v. State, 930 So. 2d 678 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)
  …was to obtain an admission from the defendant, a recorded conversation with the defendant also complies with the statute. See Thompson v. State, 731 So. 2d 819 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999); State v. Stout, 693 So. 2d 657 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997); Franco v. State, 376 So. 2d 1168 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). We have not found a single case in which any court has approved the admission of a recorded conversation under section 934.03(2)(c), or pursuant to other counterparts around the country, which did not involve a conversation with…
• State v. Sarmiento, 397 So. 2d 643 (Fla. 1981)
  …[*644] PER CURIAM. We have for review the decision of the District Court of Appeal, Third District, in Sarmiento v. State, 371 So. 2d 1047 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), which conflicts with Franco v. State, 376 So. 2d 1168 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). The issue we address is whether the war-rantless, electronic interception by state agents of a conversation between defendant and an undercover police officer in defendant’s home is an unreasonable interception of defendant’s pri…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• Bart Jacobs v. State, 389 So. 2d 1054 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)
  …to the subject electronic eavesdropping cannot change this result. I have more fully developed the authorities and reasoning to support this view in my dissenting opinions in State v. Shaktman, 389 So. 2d 1045 (Fla.3d DCA 1980), and Franco v. State, 376 So. 2d 1168, 1170-1172 (Fla.3d DCA 1979), upon which I rely for my dissent herein.…

  ← 1 / 2 →