J. H. WINCHESTER, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
ANTON HAK, JR., DEFENDANT IN ERROR
J. H. WINCHESTER, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
ANTON HAK, JR., DEFENDANT IN ERROR
102 Fla. 1070
Florida Supreme Court (1931)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 137 So. 276
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
— -This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court' that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Whitfield, P.J., and Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Crichlow v. Md. Cas. Co., 116 Fla. 226 (Fla. 1933)…d reargument had. The basis of such rehearing was the order of this court entered December 11, 1931, in connection with a prior appeal from an order overruling a demurrer to the bill of complaint. See Crichlow v. Maryland Casualty Co., 103 Fla. 267, 137 Sou. Rep. 276. The order of December 11, 1931, amended the judgment of affirmance by giving permission to the defendant to file further pleadings in the cause upon remand to the court below. Inasmuch as the appeal from the order overruling the demurrer was witho…1 / 2
-
Donaldson v. Stokes, 128 Fla. 93 (Fla. 1937)…On Rehearing. Per Curiam. This case is before us on petition for rehearing. The petition for rehearing is. denied, but on authority of Crichlow, et ux., v. Maryland Casualty Co., 103 Fla. 267, 268, 137 Sou. 276, the judgment of affirmance by this Court is hereby amended to read: ... The order appealed from is affirmed with leave to the Appellants in the court below to apply to the Circuit Court for an order fixing a reasonable time within which to take te…