ROBERT E. HOGAN,
v.
VIRGINIA MAYE BURTNER, A SINGLE WOMAN
ROBERT E. HOGAN,
VIRGINIA MAYE BURTNER, A SINGLE WOMAN
159 Fla. 54
Florida Supreme Court (1947)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 30 So. 2d 634
Cited by 12 cases
Opinion of the Court
Here we are asked to review on certiorari the judgment of the Circuit Court of Dade County, affirming the judgment of the Civil Court of Record of Dade County in a replevin action. The petitioner failed to show that appellant in the trial court suffered any injury by reason of the alleged errors complained of and, therefore, has failed here to show any reversible error. Certiorari is denied.
So ordered.
TERRELL, Acting Chief Justice, BUFORD and ADAMS, JJ., and HOLT, Associate Justice, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (12 total)
-
Peel v. State, 150 So. 2d 281 (Fla. 2d DCA 1963)…This Court holds that where two or more persons are killed by a single criminal act, there are as many separate and distinct offenses as there are persons killed by the unlawful act. See McHugh v. State, 160 Fla. 823, 36 So. 2d 786; State v. Bacom, 159 Fla. 54, 30 So. 2d 744, 172 A.L.R. 1050 and cases and authorities therein cited. * * * * * * “In the case at bar the evidence required to support the instant information for the manslaughter of Andrew [*298] Gerald Smith through culpable negligence in the…
-
Grady Lee McHugh v. State, 160 Fla. 823 (Fla. 1948)…not tenable and the action of the court in sustaining a demurrer to it was proper. Our reasons are that this view is supported by the great weight of authority. See note in 172 A.L.R., page 1062 following a report of our decision in State v. Bacom, 159 Fla. 54, 30 So. (2nd) 744. Also People v. Allen, 368 Ill. 368, 14 N.E. (2nd) 397, 308 U.S. 511, 84 L. ed. 436, 60 S. Ct. 132; Fleming v. Com., 284 Ky. 209, 144 S.W. (2nd) 220; Com. v. Maguire, 313 Mass. 669, 48 N.E. (2nd) 665; State v. Freedlund, 200 Minn.…
-
State v. Shaw, 219 So. 2d 49 (Fla. 2d DCA 1969)…nses are not the same if, upon the trial of one, proof of an additional fact is required, which is not necessary to be proved in the trial of the other, although the same acts may be necessary to be proved in the trial of each. State v. Bacom, 1947, 159 Fla. 54, 30 So. 2d 744, 172 A.L.R. 1050; State v. Bowden, supra; Sanford v. State, 1918, 75 Fla. 393, 78 So. 340; Vamvas v. United States, 5 Cir. 1926, 13 F. 2d 347; Goodwin v. State, 1946, 157 Fla. 751, 26 So. 2d 898; Albritton v. State, 1939, 137 Fla. 20,…
Previewing 3 of 12 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence