ARMANDO L. FRANCHI, APPELLANT,
v.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, BOARD OF REVIEW, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1979-12-19
No. 78-1775
DOWNEY, C. J., and ANSTEAD and MOORE, JJ., concur.
378 So. 2d 851 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1979) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the record we find that the order of the Board of Review affirming the decision of an appeals referee which had denied the appellant unemployment compensation benefits is not supported by competent, substantial evidence. Accordingly, the decision of the Board is reversed with directions that an order be entered granting appellant’s claim.

DOWNEY, C. J., and ANSTEAD and MOORE, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Martin Cnty. v. J. & R. Trucking, Inc., 384 So. 2d 952 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980)
    …PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Universal Building Specialties v. Apelquist, 378 So. 2d 851 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979). ANSTEAD, BERANEK and HURLEY, JJ., concur.…
  • Lazenby v. Chas. P. Irwin Yacht Brokerage, Inc., 423 So. 2d 412 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982)
    …efault by the purchaser. Inasmuch as the record also unequivocally demonstrates a default by the purchaser/appellant, the judgment on appeal is AFFIRMED. ANSTEAD, BERANEK and HURLEY, JJ., concur. . Universal Building Specialties v. Apelquist, 378 So. 2d 851 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979).…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw