LINDA SAULSBY SMITH, A/K/A LINDA SMITH, AND MICHAEL LAUREN SMITH, AN INFANT, BY HIS NEXT FRIEND, LINDA SAULSBY, A/K/A LINDA S. SMITH, APPELLANTS,
v.
ARTHUR JAMES HARDY SMITH, AND "DOES" I THROUGH X INCLUSIVE, APPELLEES
LINDA SAULSBY SMITH, A/K/A LINDA SMITH, AND MICHAEL LAUREN SMITH, AN INFANT, BY HIS NEXT FRIEND, LINDA SAULSBY, A/K/A LINDA S. SMITH, APPELLANTS,
ARTHUR JAMES HARDY SMITH, AND "DOES" I THROUGH X INCLUSIVE, APPELLEES
378 So. 2d 1309
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1980)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 7 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
This cause is hereby dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction. See Fischer v. Trafalgar Towers Association No. 2, Inc., 372 So. 2d 528 (Fla.4th DCA 1979).
ANSTEAD, LETTS and BERANEK, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Brey v. State, 382 So. 2d 395 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980)…ity of any persons witnessing such statement. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.220 (a)(l)(iii). Compliance with the rules requires more than the mere inclusion of such a person’s name in a list of witnesses who may have information about the crime. Boynton v. State, 378 So. 2d 1309 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); Lavigne v. State, 349 So. 2d 178 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). Upon objection by the defendant, the burden is on the state to initially demonstrate that previously undisclosed evidence can be admitted without prejudicing the fair trial…
-
Bradford Glenn McDONNOUGH v. State, 402 So. 2d 1233 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981)…391 So. 2d 299, 300 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). If the trial court does not hold an adequate Richardson hearing, the appellate [*1235] court cannot apply the doctrine of harmless error. Brey v. State, 382 So. 2d 395 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); Boynton v. State, 378 So. 2d 1309 (Fla. 1st DCA), cert. denied, 386 So. 2d 642 (Fla.1980). Nor can the appellate court order a post-trial Richardson hearing. Smith v. State, 372 So. 2d 86 (Fla.1979); Miller v. State, 373 So. 2d 377 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). The rules of criminal procedur…
-
Fasenmyer v. State, 383 So. 2d 706 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980)…t recent statement, failure to hold a Richardson inquiry after discovery violations by either the state or the defense is reversible error. Smith v. State, 372 So. 2d 86 (Fla.1979). There appear to be no exceptions to the rule. See Boynton v. State, 378 So. 2d 1309 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980); Henderson v. State, 372 So. 2d 217 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979); Miller v. State, 373 So. 2d 377 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979); Thompson v. State, 374 So. 2d 91 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). Reversed and remanded for a new trial. MILLS, C. J., and SHIVERS,…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Samuel and Dora Fischer v. Trafalgar Towers Ass'n # 2, Inc., 372 So. 2d 528 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979)