DIEGO I. OJEDA, PETITIONER,

v.

LOUIE WAINWRIGHT, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By (21 total)

• Bricker v. State, 462 So. 2d 556 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
  …nly where proof of guilt is clear and convincing so that even without the collateral evidence introduced in violation of Williams, the defendant would clearly have been found guilty. Adan v. State, 453 So. 2d 1195 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Clark v. State, 378 So. 2d 1315 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). We do not view the proof of guilt against the appellant in this ease as so clear and convincing that the error committed below may be deemed harmless. Accordingly, the conviction must be reversed and the cause remanded for a new…
• Wilson v. State, 490 So. 2d 1062 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986)
  …n of the Williams rule may only be considered harmless where proof of guilt is clear and convincing, so that even without the collateral evidence introduced in violation of Williams the defendant clearly would have been found guilty. Clark v. State, 378 So. 2d 1315 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Bricker v. State, 462 So. 2d 556 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). In Clark the defendant fled from the police, and was caught concealing a bag of narcotics which he had been carrying. Similarly, in Mainor v. State, 415 So. 2d 827 [*1065] (Fla…
• Thomas v. State, 393 So. 2d 22 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
  …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See, Parker v. State, 389 So. 2d 336 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); Williams v. State, 346 So. 2d 67 (Fla.1977); Clark v. State, 378 So. 2d 1315, 1316-17 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Whitted v. State, 362 So. 2d 668 (Fla.1978); Taylor v. State, 386 So. 2d 825, 827-28 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); § 924.33, Fla.Stat. (1979); Ziegler v. State, 385 So. 2d 1168 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980); Knight v. State, 374 So. 2d 1065…