JAMES A. MAY A/K/A THEODORE CLIFFORD CHASE, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JAMES A. MAY A/K/A THEODORE CLIFFORD CHASE, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
379 So. 2d 169
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1980)
Caution
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850, and this court having considered the record presented and having further determined that it conclusively appears therefrom that petitioner is entitled to no relief, the denial of his motion is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Phillips v. State, 531 So. 2d 1044 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988)…h personal observation by the police officer herein, probable cause to make the warrantless arrest did not exist. Cf Springfield v. State, 481 So. 2d 975, 977 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986). The instant case is similar in certain respects to Nickolo v. State, 379 So. 2d 169 (Fla. 4th DCA), cert. denied, 388 So. 2d 1118 (Fla.1980), wherein this court reversed a trial court’s denial of a motion to suppress physical evidence and a statement made subsequent to the arrest. As in Nicholo the facts of the instant case suppor…
-
State v. Brown, 586 So. 2d 473 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991)…est him only for possession of the cocaine in order to protect the identity of the informant. The trial court concluded that the search must fail because it was not conducted incident to a completed arrest, specifically relying on Nicholo v. State, 379 So. 2d 169 (Fla. 4th DCA), cert. denied, 388 So. 2d 1118 (Fla.1980). In Nicholo, this court de- [*474] termmed that the evidence, uncovered in a search resulting from an informant’s tip that Nicholo possessed stolen credit cards, must be suppressed because the…