ELENA Z. VILLASANA AND LESLIE VILLASANA CORTES, APPELLANTS,

v.

STANLEY H. DRILLICK AND BEATRICE DRILLICK, HIS WIFE, AND FLORIDA MASTER ANTENNA SYSTEM, INC., APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• Schumaker v. Schumaker, 931 So. 2d 271 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)
  …have been awarded alimony and that it should have been in the form of the marital residence. Alternatively, she argues exclusive possession of the marital residence should have been made to her as an incident of child support. McMaster v. McMaster, 379 So. 2d 189 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980). Further, the provision dealing with the marital residence is unclear and unworkable. We find no breach of discretion in the court’s refusal to award alimony. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla.1980). This was not a lo…
• In re the Marriage of Henry James Caldwell v. Caldwell, 400 So. 2d 1270 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981)
  …2d 949 (Fla.1980), the Florida courts held that the cústodial parent was entitled to the exclusive use and possession of the marital home until the parties’ children reached majority or until his or her remarriage. See, e. g., McMaster v. McMaster, 379 So. 2d 189 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); Bailey v. Bailey, 361 So. 2d 204, 205 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); Jones v. Jones, 330 So. 2d 536 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976); Hendricks v. Hendricks, 312 So. 2d 792 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975). Duncan rejected the asserted “inflexible rule” that exclus…
• Anderson v. Anderson, 424 So. 2d 943 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983)
  …non v. Morris, 407 So. 2d 372 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Lambert v. Lambert, 403 So. 2d 484 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Caldwell v. Caldwell, 400 So. 2d 1270 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); Abella-Fernandez v. Abella, 393 So. 2d 40 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); McMaster v. McMaster, 379 So. 2d 189 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980). This result is not affected by the fact that the custodial spouse was required to make the mortgage, tax and insurance payments on the ex-marital home as an incident of such exclusive possession.2 Accordingly, the order dismiss…

Authorities Cited

• Snowden v. Sprouse, 375 So. 2d 901 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979)
• Warth Paint Co., Inc. v. Jackson, 368 So. 2d 443 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)