GERALD M. WEINSTEIN, SIDNEY KATZ, AND KAWE, INC., A FLORIDA CORP., D/B/A REGENT DRUGS, APPELLANTS,
v.
JACK HEYMAN, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
Subsequent to the opinions found in Heyman v. Weinstein, 333 So. 2d 548 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Heyman v. WEKA, Inc., 333 So. 2d 550 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); the matter .returned to the trial court and the appellee made an election to secure a judgment solely against Katz, Weinstein, and KAWE, Inc., d/b/a Regent Drugs.
This appeal then ensued and the appellants now urge error in the original trial proceedings in denying the defendant’s motions for directed verdict. We have examined the original trial record in this connection and find no error. Therefore, the final judgment here under review be and the same is hereby affirmed. Belden v. Lynch, 126 So. 2d 578 (Fla. 2d DCA 1961); Ranger v. Avis Rent-A-Car System, Inc., 336 So. 2d 467 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Balart v. Michel’s Kartway, Inc., 364 So. 2d 90 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (24 total)
-
Summit Chase Condo. Ass'n, Inc. v. Protean Invs., Inc., 421 So. 2d 562 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)…at he did not really wish to receive the discovery requested, much preferring that the action be entirely dismissed for a failure in providing it. See Puga v. Suave Shoe Corp., 417 So. 2d 678, 682 n. 15 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982) (en banc); State v. Belien, 379 So. 2d 446 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). We should not permit this kind of maneuver even partially to succeed. . In essence, the plaintiff was penalized because it had insufficiently responded to inquiries as to why it was suing the defendants, with the result that the…
-
State v. Brown, 527 So. 2d 209 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)…rder to secure, not the speedy trial which she obviously did not want, but a speedy dismissal which the circuit court erroneously granted. See Zabrani v. Cowart, 502 So. 2d 1257 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986), aff'd, 506 So. 2d 1035 (Fla.1987); State v. Belien, 379 So. 2d 446 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). Reversed. . This case is the fifth appeal of orders in prohibition in which, on essentially identical grounds, DU1 defendants have sought to invoke the speedy trial rule to prevent their trials. In Passavant v. State, 523 So. 2…
-
State v. Guzman, 697 So. 2d 1263 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)…te, 523 So. 2d 660 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)(per curiam); Stemas v. State, 522 So. 2d 401 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)(per curiam); Prusaski v. State, 522 So. 2d 400 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)(per curiam); State v. Wassel, 502 So. 2d 476 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); State v. Belien, 379 So. 2d 446 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Homer v. State, 358 So. 2d 1176 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), cert. denied, 364 So. 2d 886 (Fla.1978). In this case, the circuit court entered prohibition against the prosecution of a D.U.I. county court case on the ground, as in Harrill,…
Previewing 3 of 24 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Beldem v. Lynch, 126 So. 2d 578 (Fla. 2d DCA 1961)
- Balart v. Michel's Kartway, Inc., 364 So. 2d 90 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)
- Ranger v. AVIS Rent-A-Car Sys., Inc., 336 So. 2d 467 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976)
- Heyman v. Weinstein, 333 So. 2d 548 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976)
- Heyman v. Weka, Inc., 333 So. 2d 550 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976)