PAUL HANSON A/K/A PAUL HANSEN, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1980-02-05
No. 79-1742
Before SCHWARTZ, NESBITT and BASKIN, JJ.
379 So. 2d 449 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1980)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850, this court having required response by the State and having considered the record presented and the State’s response and having further determined that it conclusively appears therefrom that-petitioner is entitled to no relief, the denial of his motion is affirmed. See Snow v. State, 171 So. 2d 557 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965); Simpson v. State, 164 So. 2d 224 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964), cert. dismissed, 169 So. 2d 383 (Fla.1964); Wooten v. State, 163 So. 2d 305 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964), cert. dismissed, 169 So. 2d 385 (Fla.1964).

Affirmed


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw