LINDA FRANO, AS PARENT AND NATURAL GUARDIAN OF DIANE ROBINSON, A MINOR, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE FARM MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1980-02-06
No. 79-1068
ANSTEAD, BERANEK and HURLEY, JJ., concur.
379 So. 2d 473 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1980) Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant filed an action against appellee seeking medical payment benefits and thereafter suffered the entry of an adverse judgment on the pleadings. The medical payments coverage of the appellee’s policy provided for coverage to the appellant, her spouse and her children should they be injured while as pedestrians or while occupying a vehicle insured under the liability portion of the policy. Appellant’s daughter was injured while occupying a vehicle not insured under the liability portion of the policy. Since the coverage does not apply to such a situation we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

ANSTEAD, BERANEK and HURLEY, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Freeman v. Perdue, 588 So. 2d 671 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991)
    …ly to judgments rendered by the court and not to interlocutory orders. Wagner v. Bieley, Wagner & Associates, Inc., 263 So. 2d 1 (Fla.1972); Gordon v. Barley, 383 So. 2d 322 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); Business Cards Tomorrow, Inc. v. Advisory Board, Inc., 379 So. 2d 473 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); Home News Publishing Company v. U-M Publishing, Inc., 246 So. 2d 117 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971). In the instant case, the notice of appeal was not timely. The order denying Freeman’s motion to dissolve the injunction was clearly an i…
  • Stockton v. Crapps, 382 So. 2d 891 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980)
    …thus had no effect on the time for filing a notice of appeal. Fla.R.App.P. 9.020(g); Florida East Coast Railway Company v. Southern Sanitation Service, Inc., 370 So. 2d 1200 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979); Business Cards Tomorrow, Inc. v. Advisory Board, Inc., 379 So. 2d 473 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980). Accordingly,- the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. McCORD, LARRY G. SMITH and WENTWORTH, JJ., concur.…
  • Jennings v. Jennings, 392 So. 2d 962 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980)
    …l orders of the trial court dismissing the original and first amended complaints. An order denying or granting a motion to dismiss a complaint is an interlocutory or non-final order. Business Cards Tomorrow, Inc. v. Advisory Bd., Inc. (Fla.App.1980) 379 So. 2d 473. We thus have jurisdiction to review the orders of the trial court herein dismissing the original complaint, the first amended complaint and the final order dismissing the suit with prejudice, although timely appeals were not taken from the two non-…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw