ROBLES DEL MAR, INC., (OAKS OF SEA), A FLORIDA CORPORATION, FORMERLY KNOWN AS COOK'S LANDING, INC., AND DOVENMUEHLE, INC., AN ILLINOIS CORPORATION AUTHORIZED TO DO BUSINESS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANTS,
v.
TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION EXISTING UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, EDWARD J. NOLAN, MAYOR, FRED E. GIERHART, SUZANNE M. BODEN, THAD D. WILKINS AND PAUL PARENT, AS MEMBERS OF AND CONSTITUTING THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES, APPELLEES

Fla. 4th DCA | 1979-10-17
No. 78-1329
ANSTEAD and BERANEK, JJ., and DAUKSCH, JAMES C., Jr., Associate Judge, concur.
379 So. 2d 967 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1979) Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Epifano v. Town of Indian River Shores, 379 So. 2d 966 (1979).

AFFIRMED.

ANSTEAD and BERANEK, JJ., and DAUKSCH, JAMES C., Jr., Associate Judge, concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Bedingfield v. Bedingfield, 417 So. 2d 1047 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982)
    …once the Florida court satisfied itself as to the truthfulness of the allegations about a pending Georgia proceeding, it was obligated to stay the Florida custody proceedings. Its failure to do so constitutes reversible error. See Hanson v. Hanson, 379 So. 2d 967 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979), cert. denied, 388 So. 2d 1114 (Fla.1980); Trujillo v. Trujillo, 378 So. 2d 812 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); see also Wheeler v. Wheeler, 383 So. 2d 655 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980). Next, we consider the denial of the husband’s motion to stay the…
  • Bonis v. Bonis, 420 So. 2d 104 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)
    …of child custody is pending in another state, totally ignores the foreign proceeding and exercises jurisdiction over a child, who has been in the state for less than a month, for the purpose of making a permanent custody award. See Hanson v. Hanson, 379 So. 2d 967 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980); Trujillo v. Trujillo. We reverse those parts of the Final Judgment for Dissolution of Marriage which makes determinations as to child custody; the case is remanded for further consistent proceedings. On remand the trial court i…
  • Chaddick v. Monopoli, 714 So. 2d 1007 (Fla. 1998)
    …c policies, Florida courts must defer to courts in other states in custody disputes if those courts are exercising jurisdiction in “substantial conformity” with. the. UCCJA. See § 61.1314(1), Fla. Stat. (1993);11 see, e.g., [*1014] Hanson v. Hanson, 379 So. 2d 967, 968 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979) (finding trial court erred in exercising jurisdiction when Illinois court was exercising jurisdiction in same child custody dispute substantially in conformity with UCCJA). However, when the parties disagree on jurisdiction,…

Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw