HAROLD CLINTON KNIGHT, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 1980-02-13
No. 78-1609/T4-161
ORFINGER, COBB and UPCHURCH, JJ., concur.
379 So. 2d 1017 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1980) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

See Murray v. State, 378 So. 2d 111 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).

ORFINGER, COBB and UPCHURCH, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Jollie v. State, 405 So. 2d 418 (Fla. 1981)
    …urt’s affirmance of Murray’s conviction. Other cases involving this very legal issue were pending in the Fifth District. Shortly after the Murray decision was published, the court entered orders summarily disposing of three of them—Knight v. State, 379 So. 2d 1017 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980), Allen v. State, 380 So. 2d 541 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980), and Jollie v. State, 381 So. 2d 351 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). Each of these dispositions read simply: “Affirmed. See Murray v. State [citation].” Petitions for certiorari were fil…
  • Knight v. State, 401 So. 2d 1333 (Fla. 1981)
    …ADKINS, Justice. We have for review a decision of the District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (Knight v. State, 379 So. 2d 1017 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980)), which allegedly conflicts with other decisions which place a mandatory duty upon the trial court to instruct on the penalties when so requested by the defendant. Petitioner Knight was charged with breaking and entering and gra…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw