CHARLES J. DANIEL, PETITIONER,

v.

FLORIDA PAROLE & PROBATION COMMISSION, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Metro. Dade Cnty. v. Milton, 707 So. 2d 913 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)
  …Moonlit Waters Apartments, Inc., 666 So. 2d at 900; Montes de Oca v. Orkin Exterminating Co., 692 So. 2d 257 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 699 So. 2d 1374 (Fla.1997); National Airlines, Inc. v. Division of Employment Sec. of Fla. Dept. of Commerce, 379 So. 2d 1033 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). Thus, we must decline to “imply” the term “demotion” into subsection (9)(f). See Holly, 450 So. 2d at 219. Accordingly, we reverse the order. [*916] In enacting the Whistle-blower’s Act, the legislature has commendably created a…
• Theron Remington v. City OF Ocala/United Self Insured, 940 So. 2d 1207 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006)
  …63, 365 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (explaining that this court reviews a JCC’s interpretation of law de novo). “[I]t is not a judicial function to add words to statutory language.” Nat’l Airlines, Inc. v. Div. of Employment Sec. of Fla. Dep’t of Commerce, 379 So. 2d 1033, 1035 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). Had the Legislature intended an entitlement to pharmaceutical mileage, it would have expressed itself by enacting appropriate legislation. “[CJourts have judicial power to interpret statutes, but that power cannot be used a…
• Port Carriers, Inc. v. Simmons, 412 So. 2d 910 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)
  …before the Commission and the courts in Auchter Co. v. Florida Department of Commerce, 304 So. 2d 487 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974), aff’d. sub nom.; Adams v. Auchter Co., 339 So. 2d 623 (Fla.1976), and in National Airlines v. Division of Employment Security, 379 So. 2d 1033 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). The parties have argued the merits of the availability issue to us, but we decline to rule on them at this time. The appropriate time for an appellate court to rule on these issues is after an evidentiary proceeding culminating…