WOODROW DIGGS, PETITIONER,
v.
FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION, RESPONDENT
WOODROW DIGGS, PETITIONER,
FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION, RESPONDENT
379 So. 2d 1044
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1980)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The petition for mandamus or prohibition is DENIED for petitioner’s failure to allege exhaustion of his administrative remedies. Houston v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 377 So. 2d 34 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).
MILLS, C. J., and ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr. and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
King v. Lord Colony Enters. & Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 400 So. 2d 856 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981)…Contractors, Inc., 215 So. 2d 297 (Fla. 1968). This purpose is served by awarding penalties respecting benefits the payment of which is delayed due to an incorrect compensation rate, for which no excuse is offered. Cf. Salmon v. Electro-Phos Corp., 379 So. 2d 1044 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980) (error to fail to adjudicate claim for penalties allegedly due as a result of late payment of benefits resulting from increase in compensation rate). Appellant also argues, and appellee concedes, that claimant is entitled to int…
Authorities Cited
- Houston v. Fla. Parole & Prob. Comm'n & Clarence Desye, 377 So. 2d 34 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979)