STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, APPELLANT,
v.
LORETTA ANN JACKSON, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Department of Transportation appealed a workers' compensation decision denying a social security offset for permanent partial disability benefits. The court held that the social security offset under federal law applies to all weekly compensation benefits, including permanent partial disability, contrary to the lower court's interpretation that limited it to total disability benefits.
The social security offset applies to all weekly compensation benefits regardless of whether they are temporary, permanent, total, or partial in nature. The offset is not limited to total disability benefits as the lower court held.
[1] A social security set-off is applicable to all weekly workers' compensation benefits, including those for permanent partial disability.
[2] The federal statute permits a social security set-off for periodic benefits received under a workers' compensation law for total or partial disability.
Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“the set-off applies to "[w]eekly compensation benefits payable under this chapter for disability resulting from injuries to an employee who becomes eligible for benefits under 42 U.S.C. § 423 . . . ."”
Establishes the plain language scope of the offset provision covering all weekly compensation benefits
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceLoretta Ann Jackson received permanent partial disability benefits under Florida workers' compensation law. The employer/carrier sought to apply a soc…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Permanent Partial Disability Benefits cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The only issue before the Judge of Industrial Claims in this case was whether the employer/carrier was entitled to take the social security off-set in Section 440.15(10), Florida Statutes (1977), in paying benefits to the claimant for permanent partial disability. The Judge held that Section 440.-15(10)(c) is ambiguous and that the off-set did not apply to benefits other than those for total disability, whether temporary or permanent.
We agree with the appellant that the set-off is applicable to all weekly benefits, whether permanent, temporary, total or partial. The federal statute is clear. Where there is no set-off in the worker’s compensation law, an “individual . entitled . . . under a workman’s compensation law ... to periodic benefits for a total or partial disability . ” will be subject to the social security set-off. 42 U.S.C. § 424a(a)(2).
That statute has been interpreted to require the social security set-off where, under the Michigan statute, the claimant was not compensated for actual disability, but in an “arbitrarily determined [amount] paid for the loss of a specific portion of the body.” Grant v. Weinberger, 482 F. 2d 1290, 1292 (6th Cir. 1973).
Accord, Ladner v. Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, 304 F.Supp. 474 (S.D.Miss.1969).
In Graves v. Richardson, 358 F.Supp. 1310, 1312 (W.D.Va.1973), the plaintiff’s lump sum and settlement of a contested worker’s compensation claim was set off, the court agreeing with the administrative finding that the payment was a “workman’s compensation benefit payable in a lump sum as a substitute for periodic payments . . . .”
Here, the Judge based his interpretation of the Florida statute on one sentence in Section 440.15(10)(c): “Neither the division nor the employer or carrier shall make any payment of benefits for total disability . for any period during which the employee willfully fails or refuses to authorize the release of information in the manner . . . prescribed by said rules.” He reasoned that, since the penalty applied only to those compensated for total disability, the set-off is only applicable to benefits for total disability. That belies the statement in Section 440.15(10)(a), that the set-off applies to “[wjeekly compensation benefits payable under this chapter for disability resulting from injuries to an employee who becomes eligible for benefits under 42 U.S.C. § 423 . . . .” In Capitol Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. Knowles, IRC Order 2-3756 (1979) and Hernandez v. Seabird Industries, Inc., IRC Order 2-3117 (1977), cert. den. 355 So. 2d 514 (Fla.1978), the set-off was applied to partial disability benefits. We believe a fair construction of the statute allows the set-off in this case. In any event, the Judge’s interpretation would leave the federal agency free to set off social security benefits where Florida’s law did not.
The order of the Judge of Industrial Claims is reversed as to the substantive issue and insofar as it awards attorney’s fees to the appellee.
ERVIN, SHIVERS and SHAW, JJ., concur.