FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, DIVISION OF RISK MANAGEMENT, APPELLANT,
v.
JOAN C. DAVIES, APPELLEE
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, DIVISION OF RISK MANAGEMENT, APPELLANT,
JOAN C. DAVIES, APPELLEE
379 So. 2d 1313
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1980)
Caution
Cited by 12 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
We note that appellee has not filed a separate motion for attorney’s fees, but has instead raised the question of appellate fees in her brief as a point on cross appeal. Under our rules, the proper procedure for requesting appellate attorney’s fees is to file a separate motion no later than the time for service of the reply brief. Rule 9.400, Fla.R.App.P. In the future, failure to follow this procedure will result in a denial of the fees requested.
MILLS, C. J., and McCORD and BOOTH, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (12 total)
-
Lonergan v. Est. OF Ethel L. Budahazi, 669 So. 2d 1062 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)…ling. The findings of the trial court are to be presumed correct and are to be given the same weight as a jury verdict. Parson v. Hendley, 416 So. 2d 513 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982), rev. denied, 426 So. 2d 27 (Fla.1983); Gruman v. State, Dept. of Revenue, 379 So. 2d 1313 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980); Gaisford v. Frostman, 202 So. 2d 790 (Fla. 4th DCA 1967), cert. denied, 211 So. 2d 212 (Fla.1968). Because it is the trial court who has the firsthand opportunity to hear and observe the witnesses as they testify, the trial court…
-
Fla. Dep't OF Corr. v. Bradley, 510 So. 2d 1122 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987)…based did not comply with the essential requirements of law. Section 120.-57(l)(b)9., Florida Statutes (1985); Tuveson v. Florida Governor’s Council on Indian Affairs, Inc., 495 So. 2d 790 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Gruman v. State, Department of Revenue, 379 So. 2d 1313 (Fla. 2d DCA [*1124] 1980). There is no requirement, however, that the agency review the record and it may accept the findings of fact contained in the recommended order in its final order, Schomer v. Department of Professional Regulation, 417 So. 2…
-
City OF Umatilla v. Pub. Emps. Relations Comm'n, 422 So. 2d 905 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982)…s hearing officer which were supported by competent substantial evidence. That PERC might have reached a different result had it heard the evidence does not authorize it to discard the hearing officer’s findings. See Gruman v. Department of Revenue, 379 So. 2d 1313 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980); Pasco County School Board v. Florida Public Employees Relations Commission, 353 So. 2d 108, 115 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). The Commission relies heavily on McDonald v. Dept. of Banking & Finance, 346 So. 2d 569 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977), cl…
Previewing 3 of 12 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence