WILLIAM A. LEWIS, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Campbell v. State, 972 So. 2d 263 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008)
  …he written order so that it mirrors the court’s acceptance of Campbell’s plea based solely on a violation of condition fifty-eight. The revocation based on the two grounds to which Campbell did not submit a plea must be deleted. See Landry v. State, 380 So. 2d 1191, 1192 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980) (finding that a trial court’s order reflecting different findings than the oral pronouncement could be a harmless clerical error when other conditions were sufficient basis for violation); see also Hayes v. State, 927 So. 2…
• McDONALD v. State, 409 So. 2d 224 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)
  …finding that appellant violated Condition No. 8 of his probation because the alleged violation of Condition No. 8 was dismissed by the trial court at the evidentiary hearing below. Grant v. State, 384 So. 2d 928 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Landry v. State, 380 So. 2d 1191 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). Violation of the other two probation conditions was a sufficient basis for revocation of appellant’s probation and no abuse of the trial court’s discretion was shown. Accordingly, the order of revocation is AFFIRMED but REMAND…
• Williams v. State, 876 So. 2d 27 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004)
  …ce for failure to appear under section 843.15(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2003). The state properly concedes error and we reverse. A conviction under section 843.15(l)(a), Fla. Stat., requires proof of willfulness beyond a reasonable doubt. Lewis v. State, 380 So. 2d 1191 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). The state failed to present any evidence that Appellant willfully failed to appear. The evidence, viewed in a light most favorable to the state, shows that Appellant was unaware that his hearing date had been moved up from Decem…