ARTURO ANTONIO SACASAS, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ARTURO ANTONIO SACASAS, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
380 So. 2d 1312
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1980)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed on the authority of Vinales v. State, 374 So. 2d 570 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). See Lucas v. State, 376 So. 2d 1149 (Fla. 1979); Carey v. State, 349 So. 2d 820 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977), cert. den., 354 So. 2d 979 (Fla. 1977); Coulson v. State, 342 So. 2d 1042 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Postell v. State, 398 So. 2d 851 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)…hat in a case such as this, which exemplifies the judicially recognized hazard of brief eyewitness identification of strangers made under stress, see, e. g., United States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218, 87 S.Ct. 1926, 18 L.Ed.2d 1149 (1967); Banks v. State, 380 So. 2d 1312 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980) (Hubbart, J., dissenting); Jackson v. Fogg, 589 F. 2d 108 (2d Cir. 1978); United States v. Russell, 532 F. 2d 1063 (6th Cir. 1976), we must conclude that the error of admitting the hearsay substantially affected Postell’s rights t…
Authorities Cited
- Lucas v. State, 376 So. 2d 1149 (Fla. 1979)
- Coulson v. State, 342 So. 2d 1042 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977)
- Smith v. State, 349 So. 2d 820 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977)
- Carey v. State, 349 So. 2d 820 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)
- Vinales v. State, 374 So. 2d 570 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)