TEODULA PAZ SALOMON ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
TEODULA PAZ SALOMON ET AL., APPELLANTS,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
381 So. 2d 705
Florida Supreme Court (1980)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
These appeals were transferred to us by the District Court of Appeal, Third District, because the trial court impliedly upheld the constitutionality of section 849.09, Florida Statutes (1975). The trial court’s ruling upholding the constitutionality of section 849.09, Florida Statutes (1975), is consistent with our holding in Barron v. State, 271 So. 2d 115 (Fla.1972). We hold that this constitutional issue is frivolous, and we therefore transfer this case back to the District Court of Appeal, Third District, for consideration of the remaining points on appeal.
It is so ordered.
ENGLAND, C. J., and BOYD, OVER-TON, SUNDBERG, ALDERMAN and MCDONALD, JJ., concur. ADKINS, J., dissents.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Teodula Paz Salomon v. State, 385 So. 2d 148 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)…SCHWARTZ, Judge. These cases recur for consideration by this court pursuant to the order of transfer in Salomon v. State, 381 So. 2d 705 (Fla.1980). The appellants’ primary contentions concern the alleged invalidity of wiretap intercept orders which resulted in the monitoring of their lottery activities. See the related case of Cuba v. State, 362 So. 2d 29 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), cert. d…
Authorities Cited
- Barron v. State, 271 So. 2d 115 (Fla. 1972)