BAY COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, APPELLANT,
v.
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RELATIONS COMMISSION AND ASSOCIATION OF BAY COUNTY EDUCATORS, FTP-NEA, APPELLEES

Fla. 1st DCA | 1980-03-28
No. PP-330
MILLS, C. J., and ERVIN and SHIVERS, JJ., concur.
382 So. 2d 747 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1980) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed the Public Employees Relations Commission's finding that the Bay County School Board committed an unfair labor practice by failing to provide budget work sheets to the teachers' union. The court held that budget work sheets prepared for normal budgeting purposes are not exempt from public records disclosure merely because they were later used in collective bargaining negotiations.


Holding

The court held that the budget work sheets are not exempt from disclosure under Section 447.605(3). Records prepared for other purposes, such as normal budget development, do not become exempt from the Public Records Act merely because they are subsequently used in collective bargaining negotiations.


Headnotes

[1] Budget work sheets prepared to assist a public employer in developing its budget are not exempt from disclosure under the Public Records Law, even if subsequently used in…

[2] The exemption for work products developed by a public employer in preparation for or during negotiations applies only to materials specifically created for that purpose,…

Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“All work products developed by the public employer in preparation for negotiations, and during negotiations, shall be exempt from Chapter 119.”

The statutory exemption provision that the School Board argued protected the budget work sheets from disclosure.

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

The Bay County School Board refused to provide budget work sheets to the Association of Bay County Educators following a written request. The work she…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Bay County School Board [School Board] appeals an order of the Florida Public Employees Relations Commission [PERC] finding it guilty of an unfair labor practice for failure to provide budget work sheets to the Association of Bay County Educators [ABCE] following their written request. The issue to be decided .is whether these work sheets are exempted from disclosure under the Public Records Law, Chapter 119, Florida Statutes, by virtue of Section 447.-605(3), Florida Statutes (1977). We hold they are not.

Section 119.01, Florida Statutes (1977) declares that “all state, county, and municipal records shall at all times be open for a personal inspection by any person.” Public records are defined as “. . . all documents, papers, letters, ... or other material, regardless of physical form oí characteristics, made or received pursuant to law or ordinance or in connection with the transaction of official business by any agency.” § 119.011(1), Fla.Stat. (1977). School Board does not challenge PERC’s conclusion that the budget work sheets constituted “public records” within Section 119.011(1), Florida Statutes (1977).1 Rather, School Board submits that the work sheets are expressly exempted by general law, viz, Section 447.605(3), Florida Statutes (1977), which provides:

(3) All work products developed by the public employer in preparation for negotiations, and during negotiations, shall be exempt from Chapter 119. In City of Gainesville v. State ex rel. International Association of Fire Fighters, Local No. 2157, 298 So. 2d 478 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974), this court indicated that budgetary proposals prepared in the normal and required course of municipal business would not be exempt under Section 447.023(3), Ch. 74-100, § 3, Laws of Fla. [renumbered as Section 447.605(3)], since the statute exempts only materials developed by the public employer in preparation for or during labor negotiations. In In re: The Petition for Declaratory Statement of United Teachers of Dade, 4 FPER ¶4250 (1978), PERC discussed the exemption created by Section 447.605(3). PERC noted:
Public employers make use of many public records in preparation for and during negotiations, but unless those records are ‘developed by the public employer in preparation for negotiations, and during negotiations,’ they are not exempt under Section 447.605(3). . . . Records which are prepared for other purposes do not, as a result of being used in negotiations, come within the exemption of Section 447.605(3).

There is competent, substantial evidence to support PERC’s finding that the work sheets were prepared to assist the School Board in developing its 1978-79 budget. The fact that the work sheets were subsequently used to assist the School Board in collective bargaining negotiations with ABCE did not render the documents exempt from the Public Records Act under Section 447.605(3). Accordingly, the order appealed is affirmed.

MILLS, C. J., and ERVIN and SHIVERS, JJ., concur. . Even if this issue were properly before us, we agree with PERC’s conclusion since the work sheets were “material[s] prepared in connection with official agency business which [are] intended to perpetuate, communicate, or formalize knowledge of some type,” were intended as final evidence of the knowledge to be recorded, and were not mere precursors of governmental records. Shevin v. Byron Harless, Schaffer, Reid and Associates, Inc., 379 So. 2d 633 (Fla. 1980).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …a practice prohibited by Section 447.051 occurs. While subsequent actions may affect the remedy they cannot expunge the unfair labor practice.” Ass’n of Bay County Educators, FTP-NEA v. Bay County Sch. Bd., 5 F.P.E.R. ¶ 10314, at 332c (1979) aff'd, 382 So. 2d 747, 749 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980).…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw