NURIA ELVIRA IZQUIERDO, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1980-04-08
No. 80-632
Before BARKDULL, HENDRY and BASKIN, JJ.
382 So. 2d 780 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1980) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary denial of his motion for post conviction relief under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850 and this court having considered the record presented and having further determined that it conclusively appears therefrom that petitioner is entitled to no relief, the denial of his motion is affirmed. See: Yanks v. State, 273 So. 2d 401 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973); Ashley v. State, 350 So. 2d 839 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977); Brill v. State, 350 So. 2d 1141 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • State v. Garber, 726 So. 2d 338 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999)
    …iminal procedure, or in the rules of civil procedure,1 and, in both the civil and criminal context, courts have turned to section 683.01, Florida Statutes, to determine the “legal holidays” within the meaning of the rule. See, e.g., Turner v. State, 382 So. 2d 780 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); State v. Jones, 332 So. 2d 699 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976); City of St. Petersburg v. Department of Transportation, 276 So. 2d 229 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973). Section 683.01 is contained in Title XXXIX, Commercial Relations, and designates cert…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw