DAVID W. LAWTON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1980-04-23
No. 79-2167
GRIMES, C. J., and BOARDMAN and DANAHY, JJ., concur.
382 So. 2d 868 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1980) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

David W. Lawton appeals from the revocation of his probation by the Charlotte County Circuit Court. We strike from the order of revocation of probation the finding that the appellant violated condition (5) of the terms of his probation by trespassing in violation of Section 810.09, Florida Statutes (1977). The revocation order is affirmed in all other respects.

It appears, however, from the record before us that the trial judge did not properly credit the appellant for time served in the county jail as a special condition of the probation order. State v. Jones, 327 So. 2d 18 (Fla.1976). Accordingly, we must remand for resentencing, with instructions that the trial judge determine the amount of time the appellant spent in the county jail and properly credit the appellant for that time.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

GRIMES, C. J., and BOARDMAN and DANAHY, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Garland P. Parlier v. Eagle-Picher Indus., Inc., 622 So. 2d 479 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993)
    …sdiction of the court. [*481] There is a general rule of appellate review, based on practical necessity and fairness to the opposing party and the trial judge, that issues not timely raised below will not be considered on appeal. Schweigel v. State, 382 So. 2d 868 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). The rule applies to issues of procedural irregularities (Commodore Plaza at Century 21, etc. v. Cohen, 350 So. 2d 502 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977), cert. denied, 362 So. 2d 1051 (Fla.1978)) as well as the presentation and proof of affirma…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw