DENISE DUVAL BERDEAL, APPELLANT,
v.
CARLOS G. BERDEAL, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1980-05-06
Nos. 79-464, 78-2080
Before BARKDULL and HENDRY, JJ., and PEARSON, TILLMAN (Ret.), Associate Judge.
382 So. 2d 1371 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1980) Caution
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So. 2d 13 (Fla.1976); Schatz v. Schatz, 356 So. 2d 892 (Fla.3d DCA 1978); Storer v. Storer, 353 So. 2d 152 (Fla.3d DCA 1977); Herzog v. Herzog, 330 So. 2d 116 (Fla.3d DCA 1976); Sections 61.13 and 61.16, Florida Statutes.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Perez v. Universal Eng'g Corp., 413 So. 2d 75 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)
    …nded for further consistent proceedings. . The action against Maulé Industries is the subject of a separate appeal, Perez v. Maule Industries, Inc., 411 So. 2d 960 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). . In a companion case, Valdes v. Western Knapp Engineering Co., 382 So. 2d 1371 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), summary judgment was reversed, Western having candidly confessed error in light of Overland Construction Co. v. Sirmons, infra. . The courts shall be open to every person for redress of injury, and justice shall be administered…
  • W. Knapp Eng'g Co. v. Maule Indus., Inc., 452 So. 2d 1050 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)
    …2d 515 (Fla.1982), quashing Perez v. Maule Industries, Inc., 411 So. 2d 960 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Perez v. Universal Engineering Corp., 413 So. 2d 75 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), remanded, 451 So. 2d 463 (Fla.1984); and Valdes v. Western Knapp Engineering Co., 382 So. 2d 1371 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), the cross-claims of the once-again exposed defendants likewise must be reinstated by the reversal of the instant summary judgments. We reject Universal Engineering Corporation’s separate contention that because the summary judg…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw