ALLEN R. DENTON, A/K/A ALLEN ZOLLMAN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court affirmed the conviction but remanded for a determination of whether the appellant had a prior felony conviction to justify habitual offender sentencing.
The appellant was convicted of sexual battery, kidnapping, and robbery and sentenced to thirty years. The sentence was based on habitual offender stat…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Sentencing Procedure cases and more on FLexlaw
RYDER, Judge.
The appellant was convicted of sexual battery, kidnapping, and robbery. He was sentenced to thirty years on the sexual battery charge. We affirm his conviction on all counts, however, we remand for a determination whether the appellant has been previously convicted of a felony in this state.
The appellant alleges the trial court erred in sentencing him to an excessive term for sexual battery. A defendant who has been convicted of a felony in Florida may be sentenced as an habitual felony offender. A habitual offender who is convicted of a felony in the second degree, may be sentenced to a term not exceeding thirty years. Section 794.011(5), Florida Statutes (1977), provides that sexual battery is a second degree felony. Therefore, if the appellant had been convicted previously of a felony, his sentence would not be excessive.
At the appellant’s sentencing hearing, defense counsel and the state attorney stated that the appellant had been convicted previously of a felony. The appellant, however, denied.this stating he believed the charge had been reduced to a misdemeanor. No document verifying the appellant’s status as a convicted felon was ever produced. Because we cannot determine from the record that the appellant was an habitual felony offender, we remand for clarification of this issue and if appellant is to be treated as an habitual felony offender and sentenced accordingly, then the trial court also is instructed to follow the procedure in relation thereto set forth in Eutsey v. State, 383 So. 2d 219. If the trial court ascertains the appellant has not been convicted of a prior felony, it should enter an amended sentence for sexual battery not to exceed fifteen years.
AFFIRMED in part, but REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
GRIMES, C. J., and CAMPBELL, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Smith v. State, 584 So. 2d 154 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)…tutory maximum sentence for a burglary count, a second degree felony, is 30 years when a defendant is habitualized. § 775.-084(4)(a)2., Fla.Stat. (1987). Accordingly, the 10/5 split sentence was proper as to the burglary conviction. Denton v. State, 382 So. 2d 1381 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980). However, we agree with the defendant that the 10/5 split sentence on the grand theft and fraudulent use of a credit card counts, both third degree felonies, exceed the maximum ten years’ state prison term for a habitualized defen…
Authorities Cited
- Fredford James Eutsey v. State, 383 So. 2d 219 (Fla. 1980)