STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,

v.

WILLARD WAYNE MUNGER, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Solimena v. State, 402 So. 2d 1240 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
  …8 So. 2d 427 (Fla.1981). When the legislature confers authority on an agency charged with administering an aspect of police power, agency discretion must be governed by legislative standards and must be subject to judicial review. Reynolds v. State, 383 So. 2d 228 (Fla.1980); Florida State Board of Architecture v. Wasserman, 377 So. 2d 653 (Fla.1979). When “neither the agency nor the courts can determine whether the agency is carrying out the intent of the legislature”, Askew v. Cross Key Waterways, supra at…
• Astral Liquors, Inc. v. Dep't OF Bus. Reg., 463 So. 2d 1130 (Fla. 1985)
  …all conceivable situations that may confront the agency. The discretion granted an agency in these situations must, however, be “sufficiently governed by legislative standards as to constitute a judicially reviewable discretion.” Reynolds v. State, 383 So. 2d 228, 230 (Fla.1980) (citing Florida State Board of Architecture v. Wasserman, 377 So. 2d 653 (Fla. 1979)). Discretionary authority is necessary for agencies involved in the issuance of licenses and the determination of fitness of applicants for license…
• Int'l Bhd. OF Painters & Allied Trades, AFL-CIO v. Anderson, 401 So. 2d 824 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981)
  …nstitutional scrutiny under a void for vagueness challenge if it is specific enough to give persons of common intelligence and understanding adequate warning of the proscribed conduct. Sanicola v. State, 384 So. 2d 152 (Fla.1980); Reynolds v. State, 383 So. 2d 228 (Fla.1980). We hold that the rule sufficiently measures up to this standard. Here the Union’s breach of Rule 38D-20.-02 occurred because of its failure to provide adequate advance notice to all unit employees of the ratification meeting and of the…

Authorities Cited

• State v. Bender, 382 So. 2d 697 (Fla. 1980)