WILLIAM J. TILLMAN, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1980-02-26
No. 79-263
Before BARKDULL and HENDRY, JJ., and EZELL, BOYCE F., Jr. (Ret.), Associate Judge.
383 So. 2d 915 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1980) Positive Treatment
Cited by 10 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of this appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed. See: Schneble v. State, 201 So. 2d 881 (Fla.1967); State v. Allen, 335 So. 2d 823 (Fla.1976); Zuberi v. State, 343 So. 2d 664 (Fla.3d DCA 1977); Jones v. State, 360 So. 2d 1293 (Fla.3d DCA 1978); Rodriguez v. State, 379 So. 2d 657 (Fla.3d DCA 1980).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Crigger v. Fla. Power Corp., 436 So. 2d 937 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983)
    …ting Downing v. Bird). . See cases collected in 3 Powell on Real Property ¶413, at 108-09 nn. 11-12 (rev. ed. . 1981). . At common law and in this state 20 years is required to create a prescriptive easement. St. Joe Paper Co. v. St. Johns County, 383 So. 2d 915 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980), cert. denied 388 So. 2d 1118 (Fla.1980). Why is the period of adverse possession necessary to acquire title to land (which includes the right to make any and all lawful use of the land) 7 years but 20 years of a particular adver…
  • Hancock v. Tipton, 732 So. 2d 369 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999)
    …found that the Hancocks constructed it at their sole expense. The failure of that element alone defeats a dedication under the statute. See, e.g., Genet v. City of Hollywood, 400 So. 2d 787 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); St. Joe Paper Co. v. St. Johns County, 383 So. 2d 915 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); but cf. Madden v. Florala Telephone Co., 362 So. 2d 475 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978)(evidence of unrecorded map which purportedly showed compliance with road dedication requirements, county’s adoption of map and maintenance of road for m…
  • Star Island Assocs. v. City OF ST. Petersburg Beach, 433 So. 2d 998 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983)
    …e disputed roadway because it graded the path on the utility easement and put shell on it. Although arguably those facts may not support a showing of road construction within the meaning of section 95.361, see St. Joe Paper Co. v. St. John’s County, 383 So. 2d 915 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980), petition for review denied, 388 So. 2d 1118 (1980), we need not decide that issue because we cannot find that the legislative intent behind section 95.361 was to allow a municipality to claim by dedication land that is located i…

Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw