THOMAS ALBERT PANNIER, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
THOMAS ALBERT PANNIER, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
384 So. 2d 44
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1980)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary denial of his motion for post conviction relief under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850 and this court having considered the record presented and having further determined that it conclusively appears therefrom that petitioner is entitled to no relief, the denial of his motion is affirmed. Castle v. State, 305 So. 2d 794 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974), affirmed 330 So. 2d 10 (Fla.1976); Wildie v. State, 326 So. 2d 198 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Pannier v. State, 395 So. 2d 289 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)…er Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850, and this court having considered the record presented and having further determined that it conclusively appears therefrom that petitioner is entitled to no relief, the denial of his motion is affirmed. See, Pannier v. State, 384 So. 2d 44 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). Affirmed.…
Authorities Cited
- Darion Northrup Castle v. State, 330 So. 2d 10 (Fla. 1976)
- Darion Northrup Castle v. State, 305 So. 2d 794 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974)
- Wildie v. State, 326 So. 2d 198 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976)