ROBERT SIMON WORMSER, PETITIONER,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Travelers Express, Inc. v. Myriam Acosta, 397 So. 2d 733 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
  …e of how the first order is labeled. Chipola Nurseries, Inc. v. Div. of Admin., Dept. of Transp., 335 So. 2d 617 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976). . The principles of res judicata and collateral estoppel would not apply. Armellini Express Lines, Inc. v. Sexton, 384 So. 2d 310 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); Donnell v. Industrial Fire and Casualty Co., 378 So. 2d 1344 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Edwards v. Kings Point Housing Corporation, 351 So. 2d 1073 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977).…
• Robinson v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 583 So. 2d 1063 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991)
  …987); U.S. Fire Insurance Company v. Clearwater Oaks Bank, 421 So. 2d 783 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982). Appellants cogently point out that this interlocutory order cannot be infused with such res judi-cata effect. See Armellini Express Lines, Inc. v. Sexton, 384 So. 2d 310 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). At most, this order might serve as some evidence that State Farm’s position in the underlying case was not utterly without any record basis. . Interestingly, at trial, the judge engaged counsel in a dialogue about why he had de…
• Lewis v. Conn. Gen. Life Ins. Co., 427 So. 2d 254 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983)
  …a part of the complaint, so it can be considered for this purpose. However, a jury verdict is not an adjudication, and a judgment is essential to the operation of either res judicata or estoppel by judgment. Armellini Express Lines, Inc. v. Sexton, 384 So. 2d 310 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); 32 Fla. Jur.2d, Judgments and Decrees, sec. 126. [*255] Since no judgment appears on the face of the complaint and there was nothing before the trial judge at that stage of the proceeding to indicate that a final judgment had be…