VIRGIL Q. MAYO ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
EVA OWENS ET AL., APPELLEES
PER CURIAM.
This is a second appeal from the same case below, the first having been determined by our opinion in Mayo v. Owens, 367 So. 2d 1054 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979). The previous appeal was from a summary final judgment for plaintiffs/appellees as to Counts I and X of the complaint. Before our aforesaid opinion which reversed the final summary judgment was filed on February 1, 1979, the learned trial judge entered a summary final judgment as to Counts II through IX and Count XI of the complaint, making the same ruling as to Counts II through IX and XI that he had previously made as to Counts I and X. This appeal has been taken from the second summary final judgment in the case and it involves the same questions which this Court ruled upon in its opinion in the prior appeal. Appellees, simply contend here that we should recede from our previous opinion which we decline to do.
REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with Mayo v. Owens, supra.
McCORD, LARRY G. SMITH and SHIVERS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Solimena v. State, 402 So. 2d 1240 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)…0.57. The Division acted pursuant to court order. Because appellants failed to file prompt motions to dismiss, the Division’s lack of compliance with section 120.60(5)9 may not be the subject of a claim of prejudice. Sheppard v. Board of Dentistry, 385 So. 2d 143 (Fla. 1st DCA), petition for review denied, 392 So. 2d 1379 (Fla.1980); see Florida Real Estate Commission v. Frost, 373 So. 2d 939 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979). Solimena moved to dismiss for noncompliance with section 120.60(5) during hearings which were h…
-
Donaldson v. State, 425 So. 2d 145 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)…nce at an informal conference with the agency or a representative of the agency, which may be its executive director or any other designatee who may be designated at any time by the agency to conduct such conferences. Sheppard v. Board of Dentistry, 385 So. 2d 143 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980). This court agreed with the hearing officer in Sheppard that an agency is not required to formally designate a representative for purposes of an informal conference. We conclude that the same rule applies to the signing of an adm…
-
Rotstein v. Dep't OF Prof'l & Occupational Reg., 397 So. 2d 305 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980)…institution of agency proceedings” for license discipline, that notice and an opportunity to show compliance be accorded the licensee. Appellant did not urge this before the Board at any time, and the point is waived. Sheppard v. Board of Dentistry, 385 So. 2d 143 (Fla.1st DCA 1980). Appellant also urges that the Board lost jurisdiction by its failure to enter a final order within 90 days after service of the hearing officer’s recommended order. Section 120.59(l)(b), Florida Statutes (1979). The Board, which…
Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Mayo v. Owens, 367 So. 2d 1054 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979)