JAMES WOHL AND SAMUEL PATENT, D/B/A, MAJOR ASSOCIATES, APPELLANTS,
v.
HARRY RICH CORPORATION, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1980-07-01
No. 79-2084
Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
385 So. 2d 170 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1980)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Bruce Construction Corporation v. Federal Realty Corporation, 104 Fla. 93, 139 So. 209 (1932); Vassar v. State, 139 Fla. 213, 190 So. 434 (1939); Dadswell v. State, 186 So. 2d 274 (Fla.2d DCA 1966); Joe Hatton, Inc. v. Conner, 247 So. 2d 782 (Fla.4th DCA 1971); CIC Leasing Corp. v. Dade Linen and Furniture Co., 279 So. 2d 73 (Fla.3d DCA 1973); Mart v. Leibman, 281 So. 2d 367 (Fla.3d DCA 1973); Bali v. Papp, 317 So. 2d 801 (Fla.4th DCA 1975).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw