STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANT,

v.

JAIME CHACON, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Gov't Emps. Ins. Co. v. Lazara E. Gonzalez, 512 So. 2d 269 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)
  …nzalez’s attorney, however, notified the company that other health insurance was available to cover the hospital expenses and demanded that the PIP benefits be paid directly to the insured as lost wages. Cf. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Chacon, 385 So. 2d 179 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980) (per curiam); Holloway v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 370 So. 2d 452 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979). Faced with these supposedly conflicting claims, GEICO, although it consistently took the position that, because of the extent of the inj…
• TEN Assocs. v. McCUTCHEN, 398 So. 2d 860 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
  …d 1216 (Fla.1978), we hold that consent to introduction of the same evidence previously objected to acts as a waiver to that objection and results in this point not being properly preserved for our review. See, e. g., Dowd v. Star Manufacturing Co., 385 So. 2d 179 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). Affirmed. . Other jurisdictions find a duty on the part of a landlord to protect tenants from foreseeable criminal activity based on either (a) warranty of habitability, see Flood v. Wisconsin Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc.…
• THE Florida BAR v. Allstate Ins. Co., 391 So. 2d 238 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)
  …t an appropriate search for the documents had been conducted rendered Johnston’s testimony as to their contents plainly incompetent under the best evidence rule. Neylans v. Herndon, 79 Fla. 213, 84 So. 89 (1920); see, Dowd v. Star Manufacturing Co., 385 So. 2d 179 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); compare, Action Fire Safety Equipment, Inc. v. Biscayne Fire Equipment Co., Inc., 383 So. 2d 969 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). . There was no showing that the clients, Johnston’s principals, had done or said anything to induce Allstate to…

Authorities Cited

• Holloway v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 370 So. 2d 452 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979)