ROBERT E. HANSEN, APPELLANT,

v.

JEROME NAGELBUSH, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Berger v. Jacquie R. Berger, 559 So. 2d 737 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990)
  …nge Brevard Plumbing and Heating Company v. La-Croix, 137 So. 2d 201 (Fla.1962). Further, contempt is unavailable as a means of enforcing an order adjudicating a support ar-rearage when the child has attained his or her majority. Roberts v. Roberts, 385 So. 2d 1032 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); Wilkes v. Revels, 245 So. 2d 896 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970), [*739] cert. denied, 247 So. 2d 437 (Fla.1971). Because Samantha had attained her majority some ten months before the order, Jac-quie’s proper remedy is to obtain a judgment…
• Kutz v. Fankhanel, 608 So. 2d 873 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992)
  …mpt, filed in Orange County, Florida, because both Syme and Zachary were over eighteen years of age when the action was filed. The claimed arrearages had accrued while the children were under eighteen years of age. Kutz relies on Roberts v. Roberts, 385 So. 2d 1032 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980) which held that after a child attains the age of majority, past due child support arrearages are not enforceable by contempt. Because the present case culminated in a judgment for arrearages, however, Roberts is not controlling.…
• Catches v. Catches, 409 So. 2d 1199 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)
  …ges in support money after the child has attained the age of majority. The non-availability of civil contempt proceedings for the collection of arrearages in alimony subsequent to petitioner’s remarriage has also been determined. Roberts v. Roberts, 385 So. 2d 1032 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980). Unlike the situation in Wilkes, Smith, and Roberts, the appellee in the case sub judice was found to be in contempt prior to the appellant’s remarriage and while the child was a minor. The trial court’s power to entertain the mo…

Authorities Cited

• Alexander v. First Nat'l Bank OF Titusville, 275 So. 2d 272 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973)
• Morrison Kimbrough & Pace Fin. Co., Inc. v. McCRANIE, 325 So. 2d 70 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976)