THE FLORIDA BAR. RE PETITION TO AMEND FLORIDA BAR INTEGRATION RULE, ARTICLE V, SECTION 6 (EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE)
PER CURIAM.
The Florida Bar has proposed an amendment to Florida Bar Integration Rule, article V, Section 6. We grant the Bar’s petition and Florida Bar Integration Rule article V, Section 6 is amended to read as follows:
Article V
SECTIONS AND COMMITTEES
* * * * * *
6. The president, with the approval of the Board of Governors, shall appoint the standing committees as specified in the bylaws, including an executive committee composed of the president, president-elect, chairman of the Budget Committee, and four other members of the Board, and such special committees as he may deem desirable.
This amendment is effective immediately.
It is so ordered.
ADKINS, Acting C. J., and OVERTON, ENGLAND, ALDERMAN and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (14 total)
-
Metro. Dade Cnty. v. Chase Fed. Hous. Corp., 737 So. 2d 494 (Fla. 1999)…offenses. See State ex rel. Baker v. McCarthy, 122 Fla. 749, 166 So. 280 (1936) (subsequent conflicting state law renders prior ordinance void to extent of direct conflict); Sun Harbor, 700 So. 2d at 180; see also Board of County Comm’rs v. Wilson, 386 So. 2d 556, 561 (Fla.1980) (electors’ rights under County’s Home Rule Charter were ineffective and superseded by a subsequent conflicting general law). If political subdivisions were able to continue actions to enforce ordinances that conflict with general law…
-
Sarasota Alliance FOR Fair Elections, Inc. v. Browning, 28 So. 3d 880 (Fla. 2010)…strictions on the Sarasota County Board of Commissioners not permitted by the statute authorizing the Board’s choice of a voting system from any of the systems approved by the Department of State.3 See Bd. of County Comm’rs of Dade County v. Wilson, 386 So. 2d 556 (Fla.1980) (declaring a proposed ordinance unconstitutional because it was in conflict with general law; the proposed ordinance would set millage rates through an initiative petition process rather than through the governing body of the county as re…
-
City OF Miami Beach v. Rocio Corp., 404 So. 2d 1066 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)…th state and local governments in areas not preempted by the state, concurrent legislation enacted by municipalities may not conflict with state law. If conflict arises, state law prevails. Cf. Board of County Commissioners of Dade County v. Wilson, 386 So. 2d 556 (Fla.1980) (the enabling constitutional language of the Dade County Home Rule Charter provides that in the event of a conflict between a county ordinance and the Florida Constitution or general law, general law prevails). An ordinance which suppleme…
Previewing 3 of 14 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence