ROSELLA FUTCH MOPSICK, APPELLANT,

v.

WILLIAM C. FUTCH, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (13 total)

• Nat'l Ventures, Inc. v. Water Glades 300 Condo. Ass'n, 847 So. 2d 1070 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)
  …ial de novo within thirty days. We also reverse the trial court’s dismissal of National Ventures’s conversion claim. The court dismissed this claim because the property at issue had already been sold. In so ruling, the court cited Page v. Matthews, 386 So. 2d 815 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980), wherein the fifth district stated that “an action for conversion is regarded as a possessory action and the plaintiff must have a present or immediate right of possession of the property in question.” Id. at 816. We do not inte…
• Foresight Enters., Inc. v. Leisure Time Props., Inc., 466 So. 2d 283 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985)
  …permitted on damages recovered for the conversion of personalty from the date of the conversion. See Moody v. Caulk, 14 Fla. 50 (1872); Robinson v. Hartridge, 13 Fla. 501 (1870); Skinner v. Pinney, 19 Fla. 42, 45 Am.Rep. 1 (1882); Page v. Matthews, 386 So. 2d 815 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); Gillette v. Stapleton, 336 So. 2d 1226 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976); Pettigrew v. W. & H. Development Co., 122 So. 2d 813 (Fla. 2d DCA 1960); Capital Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. General Motors Acceptance Corp., 105 So. 2d 899 (Fla. 1st DCA 1…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• LEE Cnty. Bank v. Errol B. Winson, 444 So. 2d 459 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983)
  …improperly instructed and that the correct measure of damages was the reasonable value of the automobile at the time of conversion less the amount of the bank’s security interest plus legal interest to the date of the verdict. See Page v. Matthews, 386 So. 2d 815 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). The bank’s interest would include the $1,500 single payment note by virtue of the “cross collateral” clause in that note. The court concluded, however, that appel-lee was entitled to damages under section 679.507, Florida Statut…

Authorities Cited

• Annalee Erhardt v. Erhardt, 362 So. 2d 70 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978)