PATRICIA HALL, APPELLANT,
v.
ANDREW C. HALL, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1980-08-26
No. 86-1473
Before SCHWARTZ, NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
386 So. 2d 904 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1980) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Upon the appellee’s confession that the trial court’s order changing temporary custody of the parties’ minor children from the appellant to the appellee was made without adequate notice, in the absence of the appellant being represented, and upon inadequate testimony, the trial court’s order rendered June 13, 1980, is vacated and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Leisure v. State, 429 So. 2d 434 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)
    …n should be granted unless the State can show that by reason of events occurring since the entry of the plea, it has been prejudiced in now being able to prove its case. Pittman v. State, 382 So. 2d 1227 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979); see also Gainey v. State, 386 So. 2d 904 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980), and Gray v. State, 379 So. 2d 435 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980). Finally, we note that our holding in this case does not conflict with our previous decisions in Alexander v. State, 399 So. 2d 110 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981), Puccio v. State, 424…
  • Gainey v. State, 396 So. 2d 194 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980)
    …al of his motion to suppress certain physical _ evidence. We relinquished jurisdiction to the trial court for a determination of whether the ruling on appellant’s motion to suppress the tangible evidence was dispositive of the case. Gainey v. State, 386 So. 2d 904 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980). The trial court entered an order on October 14, 1980, finding that the motion to suppress did not present a dispos-itive issue. The defendant’s nolo conten-dere plea was entered prior to the date of Brown v. State, 376 So. 2d 38…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw