SOL MEGDALL

v.

ORIGINAL HOFFMAN'S INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, AND HOFFMANS, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION

Citator

Cited By

• The Mead Corp. v. Mason, 191 So. 2d 592 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966)
  …and affirm. “The intentional and unjustified interference with the advantageous business relationship existing between others which results in injury constitute a tort tender, the law of this State.” 2 The defendants cite [*594] Nicol v. Bressler, 159 Fla. 668, 32 So. 2d 457 (1947) in support of their argument that no damages have been established since the broker still has all that he could have —a claim for compensation against the seller. Although the Nicol case does assert that point of view, our cour…
• ORO Verde Groves, Inc. v. Fuchs, 136 So. 2d 12 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962)
  …the able trial judge committed no error in granting summary judgment for the plaintiff against the defendants. See Schneider v. Binder, Fla.1954, 72 So. 2d 909; Williams v. Dr. P. Phillips & Sons, 160 Fla. 110, 33 So. 2d 637; Nicol v. Bressler, 159 Fla. 668, 32 So. 2d 457; Dr. P. Phillips & Sons v. Kilgore, 152 Fla. 578, 12 So. 2d 465. See also Prosser, Torts (2d ed 1955) S. 46, pp. 234-35. Accordingly, the judgment appealed from should be and hereby is, affirmed. PEARSON, TILLMAN, C. J., concurs…
• Borinsky v. Cohen, 86 So. 2d 814 (Fla. 1956)
  …l has his right of action, if any, against-the seller but not against the purchasers with whom he had no contract. This conclusion is adequately sustained by our decisions in Robertson v. Williams, 158 Fla. 163, 28 So. 2d 114; and Nicol v. Bressler, 159 Fla. 668, 32 So. 2d 457. As an equity cause this case is not even remotely similar to Moss v. Sperry, 140 Fla. 301, 191 So. 531, 125 A.L.R. 909. As to the second count, however, the allegations are different in that this count specifically reaverred all all…

Authorities Cited

• Nicol v. Bressler, 159 Fla. 668 (Fla. 1947)
• Robertson v. Martie Williams and Horace E. Henderson, 158 Fla. 163 (Fla. 1946)
• Coleman Hill v. State, 158 Fla. 162 (Fla. 1946)