ANNETTE J. RING, APPELLANT,
v.
CARL LORESCH AND PYMS-SUCHMAN REALTY, APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 1980-07-29
Nos. 79-2209, 80-513
Before SCHWARTZ, NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
386 So. 2d 1251 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1980) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of Shouse v. Doane, 39 Fla. 95, 21 So. 807 (1897). See also Boswell v. Dickinson, 300 So. 2d 61 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974), cert. denied, 312 So. 2d 742 (Fla.1975); English v. Clark, 289 So. 2d 33 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974), aff’d after remand, 319 So. 2d 170 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975); 81 C.J.S. Specific Performance § 39b (1977).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Al Weiner v. Weiner, 403 So. 2d 408 (Fla. 1981)
    …[*409] McDONALD, Justice. In this case we review Weiner v. Weiner, 386 So. 2d 1251 (Fla.3d DCA 1980), because of conflict with Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla.1980). Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla.Const. We agree that no abuse of the trial court’s discretion has been shown and that the district court improperly substituted it…
  • Weiner v. Al Weiner, 405 So. 2d 312 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
    …PER CURIAM. WHEREAS, the judgment of this court was entered on July 29, 1980 (386 So. 2d 1251, Fla.App.) affirming in part and reversing in part the judgment of the Circuit Court for Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and WHEREAS, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida, by its opinion…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw