DONALD WALTER WITT, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Inventory Search cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Appellant/defendant appeals, asserting error in the denial of his motion to suppress certain evidence found by an arresting police officer during an inventory search of his automobile. After a jury trial at which a gun found in defendant’s car was introduced, defendant was found guilty of robbery with a firearm.
Although appellant moved. to suppress the gun prior to trial, he failed to object to the gun’s introduction at trial. Appellant has, therefore, failed to preserve the alleged error for appellate review. O’Berry v. Wainwright, 300 So. 2d 740 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974); Jones v. State, 360 So. 2d 1293 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).
We have considered the other points raised by appellant in support of his appeal and find no error demonstrated. The conviction and judgment below are hereby affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
ANSTEAD, BERANEK and HERSEY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Kruse v. State, 483 So. 2d 1383 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986)…s statement that the expert was of the opinion that the child was truthful in relating her account of the sexual assault. However, no objection to this statement was raised at trial and as such the objection must be considered waived. Witt v. State, 388 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); DeLuca v. State, 384 So. 2d 212, 213 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980). In our view direct testimony on the credibility of witnesses is inherently unreliable. We have already discussed some problems relating to a juror’s treatment of expert t…
-
Casto v. Casto, 404 So. 2d 1046 (Fla. 1981)…BOYD, Justice. This cause is before the Court on petition for certiorari to review the decision in Casto v. Casto, 388 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980). The decision was a dismissal of petitioner’s appeal as untimely filed under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110(b). The district court of appeal certified that its decision passed upon a question of great public importance…
-
Isidro Rodriguez v. State, 433 So. 2d 1273 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)…time the tapes were offered for admission at trial, and that objecting on other grounds did not preserve the issue. Fraterrigo v. State, 151 Fla. 634, 10 So. 2d 361 (Fla.1942); Robertson v. State, 94 Fla. 770, 114 So. 534 (Fla.1927); Witt v. State, 388 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); Roban v. State, 384 So. 2d 683 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); Kiddy v. State, 378 So. 2d 1332 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); Stanley v. State, 357 So. 2d 1031 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Jones v. State, 360 So. 2d 1293 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Tennant v. State,…
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Blowers v. Williams, 360 So. 2d 1293 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978)
- Jones v. State, 360 So. 2d 1293 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)
- O'Berry v. Louie L. Wainwright, 300 So. 2d 740 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974)