DAVID S. PEMBERTON, APPELLANT,
v.
MIRIAM A. PEMBERTON, APPELLEE
DAVID S. PEMBERTON, APPELLANT,
MIRIAM A. PEMBERTON, APPELLEE
388 So. 2d 22
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1980)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
DANAHY, Judge.
The trial judge in this case entered a final judgment in favor of appellee for ar-rearages in alimony and child support totaling $23,292.95 and permitted execution to issue on that judgment. We find no basis to disturb the trial judge’s decision to enforce appellant’s liability to appellee in this manner. Appellee, however, concedes that the amount of the judgment is incorrect and should be reduced. Accordingly, we reverse with directions that the trial judge enter an amended final judgment reflecting the correct dollar amount as conceded by appellee.
Other than as to the amount, the final judgment is affirmed.
AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED.
HOBSON, Acting C. J., and OTT, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bennett v. Berk, 400 So. 2d 484 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)…91 So. 2d 40 (Fla.1966); Perez, II v. City of Miami, 358 So. 2d 1132 (Fla.3d DCA 1978). An insurance broker may be liable for damages where there is an agreement to procure insurance and a negligent failure to do so. Marlor v. Foley Carter Ins. Co., 388 So. 2d 22 (Fla.2d DCA 1980); Cat ’n Fiddle, Inc. v. Century Insurance Company, 200 So. 2d 208 (Fla.3d DCA 1967), vacated in part on other grounds, 213 So. 2d 701 (Fla.1968). It is uncontested that the insurer communicated to brokers Kane and Beck that the f…