HAROLD HERBERT HUNTE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that a probation condition requiring submission to warrantless searches by any law enforcement officer is invalid, but the conviction for possession of an illegal weapon is affirmed.
[1] A warrantless search of a vehicle is permissible when conducted incident to a lawful arrest and the contraband is in plain view.
[2] A condition of probation requiring submission to a warrantless search by any law enforcement officer, not just a probation officer, is invalid.
Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceHunte was convicted of possession of an illegal weapon after a police officer stopped him for an expired license tag, observed what appeared to be a w…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Probation Conditions cases and more on FLexlaw
SHARP, Judge.
Hunte appeals his conviction of possession of an illegal weapon (a short barrelled shotgun) contrary to section 790.221, Florida Statutes (1979). He also challenges the validity of “condition eleven” of the conditions of probation imposed by the court at sentencing. This condition required him to submit to a “search of your person, residence, or automobile, by any law enforcement officer or your probation officer without a search warrant.”
Hunte pled nolo contendere to the charges, reserving his right to appeal the denial by the trial court of his motion to suppress physical evidence-the shotgun. A police officer stopped Hunte because Hunte was driving a car with an expired license tag. While approaching Hunte’s car and talking with Hunte the officer saw what appeared to him to be a weapon under Hunte’s car seat, and sticking partially out in front of the seat. The officer testified it had a “squared stock with a rather rough looking hammer like on a pistol hammer.” He arrested Hunte, searched him, and then searched the car and obtained the shotgun. Clearly the search was incident to a lawful arrest,1 and the weapon was in plain view.2 The trial court’s denial of the motion to suppress was proper. Wigfall v. State, 323 So. 2d 587 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975).
That part of the condition of probation which requires Hunte to submit to a warrantless search of his person, residence or car by anyone other than his probation officer is invalid. Grubbs v. State, 373 So. 2d 905 (Fla.1979); Jones v. State, 384 So. 2d 956 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); Wood v. State, 378 So. 2d 110 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); Smith v. State, 383 So. 2d 991 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).
That condition is hereby stricken.
In all other regards, the judgment is affirmed.
AFFIRMED in part.
COBB and FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., JJ., concur. . § 901.21(2), Fla.Stat. (1979).
. State v. Forrest, 305 So. 2d 292 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974), cert. denied 325 So. 2d 189 (Fla.1975). See also Stevens v. State, 354 So. 2d 111 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Grubbs v. State, 373 So. 2d 905 (Fla. 1979)
- Sautter v. Victory Auto Rental Corp., 323 So. 2d 587 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975)
- Jones v. State, 384 So. 2d 956 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980)
- State v. Flores, 305 So. 2d 292 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974)
- Wood v. State, 378 So. 2d 110 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980)
- Smith v. State, 383 So. 2d 991 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980)