JEFFREY LEMAN STAFFORD, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Indigent Defendants cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of this appeal, and the appellant having filed his response thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Int'l Jai-Alai Players Ass'n v. Sports Palace, Inc., 564 So. 2d 281 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990)…that the union participated in, ratified, instigated, encouraged or condoned the illegal activity. International Union of Operating Engineers v. Long, 362 So. 2d 987 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), review denied, 372 So. 2d 469 (Fla.1979), opinion corrected by 388 So. 2d 572 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Annot., 36 A.L.R.3d 405 (1971). No direct evidence was presented to prove that the union ratified, instigated, encouraged or condoned the strikers’ actions. Sports Palace contends that ratification can be inferred because both W…
Authorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)