STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,

v.

LANIEL HOWARD, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Palm Beach Junior Coll. Bd. of Trs. v. United Faculty of Palm Beach Junior Coll., 425 So. 2d 133 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)
  …56 (Fla.1956); Green v. Stuckey’s of Fanning Springs, Inc., 99 So. 2d 867 (Fla.1957); State ex rel. Biscayne Kennel Club v. Board of Business Regulation, 276 So. 2d 823 (Fla.1973); Ft. Pierce Utilities Authority v. Florida Public Service Commission, 388 So. 2d 1031, 1035 (Fla.1980); ABC Liquors, Inc. v. Department of Business Regulation, 397 So. 2d 696 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); State Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services v. Framat Realty, Inc., 407 So. 2d 238 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981). As we observed in Framat…
• Ina M. Baeza v. PAN American/National Airlines, Inc., 392 So. 2d 920 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)
  …of a statute by the agency or body charged with its administration is entitled to great weight and will not be overturned unless it is clearly erroneous. Ft. Pierce Utilities Authority of the City of Ft. Pierce v. Florida Public Service Commission, 388 So. 2d 1031 (Fla.1980) (Case No. 57,854, opinion filed September 25, 1980); State ex rel Biscayne Kennel Club v. Board of Business Regulation of State, 276 So. 2d 823 (Fla.1973). In this case, the Commission’s construction of Section 443.03(13), Florida Statute…
• Dep't of Health & Rehabilitative Servs. v. A.S., 648 So. 2d 128 (Fla. 1995)
  …or mental health or welfare by the acts or omissions of a parent). However, even if I disagreed with HRS on this point, I still could not find such a determination to be “clearly erroneous.” See Fort Pierce Utils. Auth. v. Florida Pub. Serv. Comm’n, 388 So. 2d 1031, 1035 (Fla.1980) (“[Administrative construction of a statute by the agency or body charged with its administration is entitled to great weight and will not be overturned unless clearly erroneous.”). I have real concern about the precedential effect…

  ← 1 / 2 →

Authorities Cited

• State v. Combs, 388 So. 2d 1029 (Fla. 1980)